
Agent Vs Agentless Monitoring: What’s The Difference?

To predict IT outages and system failure, rigorous monitoring of IT components is required. Monitoring of IT infrastructure helps businesses in ensuring business continuity and high service availability. Monitoring can of two types: agent-based and agentless monitoring. IT experts often debate about which type of monitoring is suitable for their organization. The aim of both agent and agentless monitoring is to boost service availability by reporting incidents in real-time. However, both types of monitoring differ based on cost, implementation, and working.
Agentless monitoring is getting more popular among the monitoring methods. Application performance monitoring via an agentless system uses a designated protocol to collect performance data. In agentless monitoring, the data and information about software systems are forwarded to the central monitoring system. Application performance monitoring without any agent uses protocols like SNMP, WMI, or SSH to collect performance data from software systems.
Agentless monitoring solutions do not need a separate application for collecting the performance data. Vendors integrate built-in features in agentless monitoring solutions that help them in collecting performance data. A software agent is embedded in the monitoring system and, you do not need an external application.
The benefits of agentless monitoring for IT teams:
In the current scenario, more businesses prefer agentless monitoring due to low implementation costs. However, application performance monitoring with an agentless solution can also have some flaws.
The cons of agentless monitoring are listed below:
Agent-based monitoring solutions are designed for specific systems. A separate vendor-specific software agent needs to be installed alongside the application performance monitoring system. The external software agent allows the monitoring system to collect and analyze from a given system. Many IT teams perform agent-based monitoring for collecting in-depth insights and data from a given system.
Both application performance monitoring techniques have their pros and cons. To understand the differences between agent-based and agentless monitoring, you should understand their pros and cons.
The benefits of agent-based monitoring for IT teams:
The cons of agent-based monitoring are listed below:
Agent versus agentless monitoring is a common debate that has been around for years. However, the recent advancements in monitoring solutions have proved beneficial for businesses. The latest monitoring systems have a blend of both agent-based and agentless monitoring. The most preferred solution for application performance monitoring is Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOps). AIOps can help businesses in performing non-stop application performance monitoring.
Why use AIOps for monitoring?
You need a perfect blend of agent-based and agentless monitoring that can be offered by an AIOps based analytics platform.
The pros of choosing an AIOps based analytics platform for application performance monitoring are as follows:
Traditional tools for agent-based and agentless monitoring cannot handle the complexity of modern-day software systems. AI for application monitoring is the only solution to handle the ever-increasing complexity of software systems. Use a blend of agent and agentless monitoring for your organization!
Please complete the form details and a customer success representative will reach out to you shortly to schedule the demo. Thanks for your interest in ZIF!