Is your IT environment proactively monitored?
It is important to have the right monitoring solution for an enterprise’s IT environment. More than that, it is imperative to leverage the right solution and deploy it for the appropriate requirements. In this context, the IT environment includes but is not limited to Applications, Servers, Services, End-User Devices, Network devices, APIs, Databases, etc. Towards that, let us understand the need and importance of Proactive Monitoring. This has a direct role in achieving the journey towards ZIF. Let us unravel the difference between reactive and proactive monitoring.
Reactive Monitoring – When a problem occurs in an IT environment, it gets notified through monitoring and the concerned team acts on it to resolve the issue.The problem could be as simple as slowness/poor performance, or as extreme as the unavailability of services like web site going down or server crashing leading to loss of business and revenue.
Proactive Monitoring – There are two levels of proactive monitoring,
- Symptom-based proactive monitoring is all about identifying the signals and symptoms of an issue in advance and taking appropriate and immediate action to nip the root-cause in the bud.
- Synthetic-based proactive monitoring is achieved through Synthetic Transactions. Performance bottlenecks or failures are identified much in advance; even before the actual user or the dependent layer encounters the situation
Symptom-based proactive monitoring is a USP of the ZIF Monitor module. For example, take the case of CPU related monitoring. It is common to monitor the CPU utilization and act based on that. But Monitor doesn’t just focus on CPU utilization, there are a lot of underlying factors which causes the CPU utilization to go high. To name a few,
- Processor queue length
- Processor context switches
- Processes that are contributing to high CPU utilization
It is important to arrest these brewing factors at the right time, i.e., in the case of Processor Queue length, continuous or sustained queue of greater than 2 threads is generally an indication of congestion at processor level.Of course, in a multiple processor environment, we need to divide the queue length by the number of processors that are servicing the workload. As a remedy, the following can be done
1) the number of threads can be limited at the application level
2) unwanted processes can be killed to help close the queued items
3) upgrading the processor will help in keeping the queue length under control, which eventually will control the CPU utilization.
Above is a sample demonstration of finding the symptom and signal and arrest them proactively. ZIF’s Monitor not only monitors these symptoms, but also suggests the remedy through the recommendation from SMEs.
Synthetic monitoring (SM) is done by simulating the transactions through the tool without depending on the end-user to do the transactions. The advantages of synthetic monitoring are,
- it uses automated transaction simulation technology
- it helps to monitor the environment round-the-clock
- it helps to validate from across different geographic locations
- it provides options to choose the number of flows/transactions to be verified
- it is proactive – identifies performance bottlenecks or failures much in advance even before the actual user or the dependent layer encounters the situation
How does Synthetic Monitoring(SM) work?
It works through 3 simple steps,
1) Record key transactions – Any number of transactions can be recorded, if required, all the functional flows can be recorded. An example of transaction in an e-commerce website could be, as simple as login and view the product catalogue, or,as elaborate as login, view product catalogue, move item to cart, check-out, make-payment and logout. For simulation purpose, dummy credit cards are used during payment gateway transactions.
2) Schedule the transactions – Whether it should run every 5 minutes or x hours or minutes.
3) Choose the location from which thesetransactions need to be triggered – The SM is available as on-premise or cloud options. Cloud SM provides the options to choose the SM engines available across globe (refer to the green dots in the figure below).
This is applicable mainly for web based applications, but can also be used for the underlying APIs as well.
SM solution has engines which run the recorded transactions against the target application. Once scheduled, the SM engine hosted either on-premise or remotely (refer to the green dots in the figure shown as sample representation), will run the recorded transactions at a predefined interval. The SM dashboard provides insights as detailed under the benefits section below.
Benefits of SM
As the SM does the synthetic transactions, it provides various insights like,
- The latency in the transactions, i.e. the speed at which the transaction is happening. This also gives a trend analysis of how the application is performing over a period.
- If there are any failures during the transaction, SM provides the details of the failure including the stack trace of the exception. This makes fixing the failure simpler, by avoiding the time spent in debugging.
- In case of failure, SM provides insights into the parameter details that triggered the failure.
- Unlike real user monitoring, there is the flexibility to test all flows or at least all critical flows without waiting for the user to trigger or experience it.
- This not only unearths the problem at the application tier but also provides deeper insights while combining it with Application, Server, Database, Network Monitoring which are part of the ZIF Monitor suite.
- Applications working fine under one geography may fail in a different geography due to various factors like network, connectivity, etc. SM will exactly pinpoint the availability and performance across geographies.
For more detailed information, or to request a demo please visit, https://zif.ai/
READ ALSO OUR NEW UPDATES
About the author
February 7, 2020
Suresh Kumar Ramasamy
“Suresh heads the Monitor component of ZIF. He has 20 years of experience in Native Applications, Web, Cloud and Hybrid platforms from Engineering to Product Management. He has designed & hosted the monitoring solutions. He has been instrumental in conglomerating components to structure the Environment Performance Management suite of ZIF Monitor.“